Sunday, March 11, 2007
Review: Marie Antoinette
Marie Antoinette follows the life of the Austrian Princess from the time that she is betrothed to the Dauphin to the time that she flees Versailles in the midst of the French treason of 1789. Putatively this is a period piece. There are plenty of lavish scenes of the royal court and lives the courtesans. Some of the most interesting points in the movie involve the elaborate ritual of the court as seen from the perspective of the relative outsider.
There were three things that I found objectionable about this movie. The first was the infusions of contemporary music into the score. It was distracting to hear an electic guitar and punk music being played over scenes set in 18th century Versailles. Related to that was the use of montage in order to speed through the passage of time. Such a device is often one of the last resource of a screen writer trying to salvage a poor script. Finally was the constant attention paid to the issue of the consummation of the marriage of Marie and Louis. This did not have to be the subject of the first half of the film. Though an important part of the film it takes too much attention away from other issues that play a larger role in the downfall of the rightful kings of France in the inevitable treason at the end (I am not spoiling anything here because it is a matter of historical fact. If me revealing the fact that Marie was involved in the French Revolution is news to you, then I do not want you reading this blog anyway, feel free to spend your time reading a history book). There is no doubt that the foibles of the Royal couple had something to do with the revolution, and that revolution looms over the entire film. It is an inevitable fact and the movie does not adequately deal with that fact.
It must be difficult to write a film about a story where everyone knows the ending, but that cannot be helped. The writer and director must come up with a strategy for dealing with this fact. This film did not do that, and that is a significant failing. Despite some of the better aspects of it.
Monday, October 02, 2006
2000 Storikengold, Dietrich Joss
Sunday, August 20, 2006
The Rating Scale
This was lost after some house cleaning on my other site. So, I've reposted it.
Ratings on this website will attempt to follow a rational and meaningful system of evaluation and quantification. There will be two systems. One system will follow a number-name system between -3 and +3 with no fractions and only a theoretical zero. The second system will be identical in substance, but since everyone on earth rates movies using stars we will condescend to a star based system. from 0 to 5 stars using only whole stars. The meanings and terminology of the system are outlined below:
| Number- Name | Stars (movie) | Descriptor | Meaning | Success |
| +3 | 5 | Very superior, fantastic | A Z-score of greater than +2 or 2.275 % of all things of this nature. (98th and 99th percentile) | STRONGLY SURPASSED Revolutionary qualities and others better start taking notice. |
| +2 | 4 | Quality, very good, excellent, | A Z-score of between +1and +2 or 13.590 % of all things of this nature. (between 84th and 97th percentile) | SURPASSED Has surpassed expectations with unique and innovative qualities |
| +1 | 3 | Legit, good, alright | A Z-score of between 0 and +1 or 34.135% of all things of this nature. (between 50th and 83rd percentile) | STRONG PASS Has met expectations with general satisfaction |
| 0 | "2 1/2" | The theoretical average | This is the theoretical average point. A grade of zero will not be given. Iit has no real existential value. Have you ever had the average wine? | |
| -1 | 2 | Not impressive, has problems | A Z-score of between 0 and -1 or 34.135 % of all things of this nature. (between 16th and 49th percentile) | WEAK PASS Did not meet all expectations, but has certain redeeming qualities |
| -2 | 1 | Junk, bad, not good | A Z-score of between -1and -2 or 13.590 % of all things of this nature. (between 2nd and 15th percentile) | MARGINAL FAIL with no redeeming qualites (wine would be rejected) |
| -3 | 0 | *@#^&# | A Z-score of less than -2 or 2.275 % of all things of this nature. (0th and 1st percentile) | SEVERE FAIL Has qualities, but they are bad. This was a step in the wrong direction |
The Z-score is a statistical tool. If you decided to sleep through your statistics course or have simply forgotten what it all means please check this website for a brief refresher:
http://www.sysurvey.com/tips/statistics/zscore.htm
Friday, August 18, 2006
Review: Domino
The action story line is told by Domino the bounty hunter in a police interrogation room. Of Course, this has been done, but Lucy Liu is the interogator and there is a good raport between the two. The main action story line develops over an inside job gone wrong, again, it has been done. What makes the movie kinda edgy is the female bounty hunter trying to prover herself. Plus the filming is done in a gritty kind of colour that lends a Bobba-Fet meets American Western in modern LA feel to the movie. I don't like making those kind of analogies any more than most people like reading them. Nonetheless I think the comparison is apt, so tough.
What does this all add up to? A solid action movie.
On the official Chris' Choice scale Domino gets three stars.
***
Sunday, September 25, 2005
Some Recent Reviews
An old movie based on the Kipling book. It was lots of fun and worth seeing. You just can't make movies like this anymore. ***
Primer
An intteresting movie that has garnered a lot of attention recently. I'm not sure it is all that is cracked up to be. Yes, it is cool that it was made for so little money. Unfortunately the narrative is very difficult to follow after a while and the movie gets a little tiresome. I don't really care how much money the movie was made for so: **
Saw
Another interesting movie with a cool premise. Too bad it falls into that category of american film making that just wants to shock and surprise with gore and twist endings. Yawn... *
Movie Review: The Constant Gardener
Just out this weekend, this is a movie based on a LeCarre book. The first layer of the story involves investigations into pharmaceuticals, testing, aids and poor Africa. But, there are several other layers - notably a beautiful love story. The acting is first class, the photography stunning and the direction great. Go see this movie ****